A new offensive by the M23 rebel group has plunged the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) into one of its worst crises in years, escalating fighting in the east.
The ongoing conflict has killed thousands and displaced millions, exacerbating instability in a region rich in minerals.
While peace efforts, including a ceasefire and a US-brokered declaration, are underway, analysts are skeptical they’ll bring lasting peace without addressing core issues like Rwandan alleged interference and M23’s ties to Kigali.
The US’s diplomatic engagement and strategic partnerships reflect a broader policy shift.
Washington is actively seeking to counter China’s dominant position in Africa’s mineral sector.
The DRC holds vast reserves of crucial minerals like cobalt and copper, and it’s eager for Western investment after years of underdevelopment.
However, the US approach might perpetuate a dynamic where Africa is primarily seen as a source of raw materials, rather than a place for value addition.
American companies will likely face resistance in markets where China has established a firm foothold in Congo’s mining industry.
Despite this, the US’s pursuit of arms and investment has provided a “footprint” in a sector China has dominated for years.
The US-Congo partnership is seen as strategic but purely transactional.
Experts believe Washington won’t fill the role China has played in offering large-scale infrastructure or port financing.
While past US administrations worked to curb China’s influence, making Congo “very pro-American,” the current relationship is largely commercial.
Transactional diplomacy, especially under a Trump administration, could further incentivize efforts to challenge China’s control in unstable environments like eastern Congo.